Article reading:
It's hard for people from democratic country like us to imagine the
life in Afghan. Afghan is now a republic country; however, what its government
and its religious council (the Ulema council) are trying to do to the country
seems like a throwback to the Taliban era (which is autocracy and
caesaropapism). The recommendation that proposed by the Ulema council is a
restrictive guidelines for women; woman's right and freedom will no longer
exist. People in Afghan divide in two: one party is the youngsters who protest
against the new law; the other party is the elders who think the law is in
accordance with Islam, their religious belief.
If I were an Afghan, as a feminist, I will join the opposition party
without hesitation. The rising of women right is a mainstream tendency in the
world. Yet, the Afghanistan
government turns the clock back to the conservative and oppressive days that
haunted women. Besides the opposition to the lated thought, I also think that
the opinion of "the new law will lead to the sharply rising expenditure of
government" is reasonable. If the officials of Afghan want to carry out
the new policy, the government inevitably has to set up new activity space for
female only. Otherwise, they have to forbid women from stepping out from their
house because once a woman goes outside her home, she may probably bump into a
guy and break the new law. It seems to me that the passing of the new law is
just a stupid decision.
I think these words in the article strongly touch my heart: "To
me a man is only a hero when he respects women and accepts them as human
beings… If you act against a woman, that means acting against your mother… Life
is only possible with a woman but you keep on chanting against them." A
lot of male chauvinists seem to ignore these facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment